5/29/2023 0 Comments Macvim vs emacs, or you can set up an alias (which is a different question beyond the scope of the one question per customer / thread general rule). OSX ships with an outdated version of Emacs with an absolute path of Feel free to try out an OSX version specific executable that matches your system version type. GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editorand more. I have only ever used the generic executables at the paths listed above. I see multiple different builds for various versions of OSX. However, Vim is an editor with a macro language Emacs is an editor written in Lisp with some ad-hoc primitives. Customizability: Both editors are programmable, and there is an extensive body of available packages for both. Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS/bin/emacsclient I don't think there's anything Vim can do significantly more efficiently than Emacs, whereas the converse is true. Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS/Emacs Īs to the first question, the great thing about Emacs from is that it is a self-contained installation. It is one question per customer / thread. , and Atom feeds are provided for tracking all three release types. In addition to the latest stable release, there are also pre-release test builds and Aquamacs has a more irregular schedule, but it's seen some pretty major updates over the last year.įor OSX can be found at. I'd recommend graphical Vim (gVim), gedit (with the GMate plugins), or Kate. Someone syncs Carbon Emacs with the upstream tree quarterly I think. Other options include Emacs and MacVim (launched with the command macvim). MacVim Python Indentation Issue pass list of objects from pyqt5 to qml returns undefined How to save images plotted on different figures to different locations in matplotlib Regular expression exclude matches surrounded by quotation marks and lines starting with Why is my laptop struggling with large data sets 16gb RAM defeated by a 1. I can't speak to the extensiveness of the included elisp packages, either. It seems stable and fast, but I am not an Emacs guru so I don't stress it all that much when I use it. It is definitely more Mac-like than Carbon Emacs. It seems stable and fast, but I am not an Emacs guru so I don't stress it all that much when I use it. Supports both traditional Mac OS style keyboard shortcuts (command-O, command-S) and the Control/Meta shortcuts for those raised on traditional Emacs. (command-O, command-S) and the Control/Meta shortcuts for those raised on traditional Emacs. Well try to steer clear of that battle and focus on what emacs does well. only allowed one window open, not very OSX in appearance. There was also a Carbon version of Vim, but this didn't offer a great deal over the Terminal version. Works well and certainly looks more mature than Vim-Cocoa, moreover there is a Cocoa plugin architecture in the pipeline for MacVim (and someone is already working on a TextMate style file browser tray plugin which is a huge ++ IMHO).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |